When an agent says 'completed,' how do you confirm that business records were actually corrected correctly?

How to clearly define completion criteria before starting execution?

First, select an easily verifiable small task, such as modifying the assignee for a to-do item in test materials. Specify which record needs changing, who the assignee should become, and what information must be preserved, then save the pre-execution state. This allows for item-by-item comparison at the end, preventing you from accepting completion descriptions in responses as delivered results.

After one success, how should repeated trials be conducted?

Prepare test copies with identical initial states, repeat the same work, and record final states and points requiring human intervention each time. Then introduce common variations, such as similarly named records, missing information, or supplementary notes, observing whether the agent continues to complete tasks as targeted. Retain materials and configurations for each round to facilitate comparison.

When something isn't fixed correctly, how do you find the problem?

Break the process into stages such as reading to target, understanding requirements, executing modifications, and reading results, preserving the necessary state at each stage. When the result does not match expectations, first determine whether the record was found incorrectly, the requirements were misunderstood, or the modification was not applied, then address the corresponding step. Focus recording on information needed to locate problems, avoiding retention of business content unrelated to the task.

If a single execution completes only part of the actions, clearly list completed and incomplete items, and let the person in charge decide the next steps. Before retrying, read the current state to confirm which actions still need to continue, reducing redundant operations. This proposes a failure handling method and should not be taken as evidence that ThinkingBox provides execution recovery or business rollback capabilities.

Under what conditions can the scope of use be expanded?

You can add the next category of tasks when results under common inputs meet expectations, failures can be identified and assigned to responsible persons, and the team can locate key records for each execution. Continue checking final results during expansion, paying special attention to condition changes brought by new tasks, and retain original manual processing entry points to facilitate handover if issues arise.

Check results with a fixed input

For a task that permits changing one order’s shipping address to A, compare the order record and confirm no other order, payment or notification changed. Repeated execution should not create duplicate notices. A chat message saying “done” is insufficient. No retail system or ThinkingBox environment was run; this example identifies state checks.